Mega Subramaniam

56 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Mega Subramaniam
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Library and Information Sciences 268
  • Communication 152
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 48
  • Computer Science Applications 94
  • Human-Computer Interaction 84
Replace Sylvia L. Edwards with:
Sylvia L. Edwards Australia
Louise Limberg Sweden
Rebekah Willett United States
Lesley Gourlay United Kingdom
Swapna Kumar United States
Els Kuiper Netherlands
Natalie Greene Taylor United States
Amber Walraven Netherlands
Jenna Hartel Canada
Kathleen Blake Yancey United States
Mega Subramaniam relative to Sylvia L. Edwards Australia Sylvia L. Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Sylvia L. Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mega Subramaniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mega Subramaniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mega Subramaniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. The network helps show where Mega Subramaniam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mega Subramaniam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mega Subramaniam Line = papers co-authored together Mega Subramaniam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Diversity and LIS Education: Inclusion and the Age of Information
201168
2 201467
3 201254
4 201348
5 201546
6 201740
7 201539
8 201035
9 201834
10 201133
11 201333
12
Digital Literacy and Digital Inclusion: Information Policy and the Public Library
201432
13 202027
14 201725
15 201824
16 201523
17 201722
18 201319
19 201418
20 201215

About Mega Subramaniam

Mega Subramaniam is a scholar working on Education, Library and Information Sciences, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 62 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (16 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (13 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers), Web and Library Services (6 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (5 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (268 citations), Communication (152 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (48 citations), Computer Science Applications (94 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (84 citations). Mega Subramaniam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, John Carlo Bertot, Beth St. Jean, June Ahn, Allison Druin, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Jessica Vitak, Priya Kumar and Yuting Liao. Their work appears in journals such as The Library Quarterly, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Library & Information Science Research and Public Library Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact