Countries where authors publish in Public Library Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Library Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Library Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Library Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Public Library Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Library Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Library Quarterly.
About Public Library Quarterly
The 812 papers published in Public Library Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Public Library Quarterly usually cover Library and Information Sciences (514 papers), Information Systems (248 papers), Communication (48 papers), Conservation (13 papers) and Public Administration (13 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Administration (476 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (227 papers), Web and Library Services (163 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (51 papers), Social Media and Politics (33 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (27 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (21 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Library Quarterly are Rachel Elizabeth Scott, Paul T. Jaeger, John Carlo Bertot, Ting Wang, Joseph R. Matthews, Brady Daniel Lund, Lili Luo, Bradley Wade Bishop, Kim M. Thompson and Sarah M. Katz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.