Mathieu Chollet

49 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Mathieu Chollet
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 204
  • Social Psychology 316
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
  • Artificial Intelligence 362
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 68
Replace Birgit Lugrin with:
Birgit Lugrin Germany
Ionuț Damian Germany
Magalie Ochs France
Elisabetta Bevacqua France
Jillian Gerten United States
Alessandro Cappelletti Italy
Catharine Oertel Netherlands
Nikolaus Bee Germany
Shiro Kumano Japan
Mathieu Chollet relative to Birgit Lugrin Germany Birgit Lugrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Birgit Lugrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Chollet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Chollet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Chollet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Chollet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Chollet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Chollet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Chollet. The network helps show where Mathieu Chollet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Chollet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Chollet Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Chollet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013122
2 2017120
3 2015104
4 201559
5 201427
6 201726
7 201424
8 201822
9 201720
10 201518
11 201517
12 201515
13 201615
14 202115
15 201814
16 201610
17 202010
18 201710
19 202410
20 20139

About Mathieu Chollet

Mathieu Chollet is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 55 papers that have together received 784 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (16 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (12 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), AI in Service Interactions (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics (4 papers) and Media Influence and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (204 citations), Social Psychology (316 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations), Artificial Intelligence (362 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 citations). Mathieu Chollet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan J. Scherer, Louis‐Philippe Morency, Catherine Pélachaud, Magalie Ochs, Ari Daniel Shapiro, Sayan Ghosh, Eugene Laksana, Hazaël Jones, Nicolas Sabouret and Rainer Stiefelhagen. Their work appears in journals such as Language Resources and Evaluation, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact