Mary E. Cramer

31 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Mary E. Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 57
  • Research and Theory 66
  • Leadership and Management 19
  • General Health Professions 174
  • Emergency Medical Services 30
Replace Jane M. Underwood with:
Jane M. Underwood Canada
Maureen Anthony United States
Cristina Maria Meira de Melo Brazil
Linda Roussel United States
Joyce A. Batcheller United States
Elaine Haycock‐Stuart United Kingdom
Taka Oguisso Brazil
Leslye Long Australia
Jean Dowling Dols United States
David M. Keepnews United States
Mary E. Cramer relative to Jane M. Underwood Canada Jane M. Underwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Jane M. Underwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. The network helps show where Mary E. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 200239
3 200633
4 200630
5 200627
6 201426
7 200720
8 201620
9 201019
10 201118
11 200816
12 201816
13 200315
14 200914
15 201413
16 200511
17 200410
18 20037
19 20076
20 20175

About Mary E. Cramer

Mary E. Cramer is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Emergency Medical Services and Plant Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (8 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (6 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (57 citations), Research and Theory (66 citations), Leadership and Management (19 citations), General Health Professions (174 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (30 citations). Mary E. Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Ann Stoner, Jan R. Atwood, Amy L. Ford, Sangeeta Agrawal, Stephen Lazoritz, Keith J. Mueller, Li‐Wu Chen, Ellen G. Duysen, Melody A. Hertzog and Katherine J. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health Nursing, Policy Politics & Nursing Practice, Nursing Outlook, Journal for Nurses in Staff Development and Western Journal of Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact