Mary E. Cramer

563 citations
34 papers · 433 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mary E. Cramer

31 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Mary E. Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Research and Theory 28
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 36
  • Emergency Medical Services 50
  • General Health Professions 181
  • Health Information Management 12
Replace Carol Jorgensen Huston with:
Carol Jorgensen Huston United States
Carol Leppa United States
Clare Hastings United States
Beate André Norway
Rowaida Al‐Maaitah Jordan
Bessie L. Marquis United States
Badran A. Al‐Omar Saudi Arabia
Michael R. Bleich United States
Laura J. Burke United States
Jane Miles United States
Mary E. Cramer relative to Carol Jorgensen Huston United States Carol Jorgensen Huston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Carol Jorgensen Huston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. The network helps show where Mary E. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201742
2 200239
3 200633
4 200630
5 200629
6 201426
7 200625
8 201619
9 200719
10 201018
11 201118
12 200815
13 200315
14 201814
15 200914
16 201412
17 200411
18 200510
19 20037
20 20076

About Mary E. Cramer

Mary E. Cramer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services and Plant Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (28 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (36 citations), Emergency Medical Services (50 citations), General Health Professions (181 citations) and Health Information Management (12 citations). Mary E. Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan R. Atwood, Julie A. Stoner, Amy Ford, Sangeeta Agrawal, Keith J. Mueller, Stephen Lazoritz, David Palm, Melody Hertzog, Elizabeth R. Stevens and Ellen G. Duysen. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health Nursing, Policy Politics & Nursing Practice, Nursing Outlook, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and Journal of Gerontological Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact