Jane Miles

10 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Jane Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Research and Theory 38
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
  • General Health Professions 291
  • Family Practice 25
  • Leadership and Management 10
Replace Ludmiła Marcinowicz with:
Ludmiła Marcinowicz Poland
Pamela Willson United States
Ullabeth Sätterlund Larsson Sweden
Eileen Furlong Ireland
Ross Baker Canada
Marie Truglio‐Londrigan United States
David Gillham Australia
Sandra P. Hirst Canada
Leena Liimatainen Finland
Janet Scammell United Kingdom
Jane Miles relative to Ludmiła Marcinowicz Poland Ludmiła Marcinowicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ludmiła Marcinowicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Miles. The network helps show where Jane Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jane Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Miles Line = papers co-authored together Jane Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2003360
2 201868
3
International cultural immersion: en vivo reflections in cultural competence.
201063
4 201326
5
Barriers to transition of obese patients from hospital to community.
201214
6 201712
7 202110
8 20114
9 20082
10
Toward increasing leadership capacity in nurses: an exploration of the state and future perspectives of leadership education in pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing programs.
20151

About Jane Miles

Jane Miles is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (1 paper), Organizational Change and Leadership (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (38 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations), General Health Professions (291 citations), Family Practice (25 citations) and Leadership and Management (10 citations). Jane Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Weinman, Susan Michie, Elaine S. Scott, Kim L. Larson, Melvin Swanson, Marie E. Pokorny, Mary Ann Rose, Mary K. Kirkpatrick, Martha Raile Alligood and Ronda G. Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Science Quarterly, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Journal of Professional Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Nursing Administration Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact