Amy Ford

1.1k citations
15 papers · 545 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Health Policy Implementation Science 1
    • Healthcare cost, quality, practices 1
    • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 2
    • Diet and metabolism studies 1

Amy Ford

13 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Amy Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 168
  • Genetics 236
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
Replace Siobhan McCarthy with:
Siobhan McCarthy Ireland
Jayne Bellando United States
Birim Günay Kılıç Türkiye
David Lambert United States
Andrea Maurizio United States
Ramona Moldovan Romania
Lisa Ouss France
Pei‐Yin Pan Taiwan
Emily Morris Canada
Victoria Villalta‐Gil United States
Amy Ford relative to Siobhan McCarthy Ireland Siobhan McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Siobhan McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Ford. The network helps show where Amy Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Ford Line = papers co-authored together Amy Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008193
2 2007132
3 201557
4 201742
5 200339
6 201226
7 200614
8 201814
9 201211
10 20149
11
Advocacy Competencies Self-Assessment (ACSA) Survey©: A tool for measuring advocacy competence.
20106
12 20041
13
ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORT FOR PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS: A CASE STUDY OF WALSALL MBC
20011
14 20240
15 20170

About Amy Ford

Amy Ford is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Genetics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper) and Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (178 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (168 citations), Genetics (236 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (9 citations). Amy Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert N. Golden, Jane E. Roberts, Donald B. Bailey, Leigh Anne H. Weisenfeld, John Sideris, Mary E. Cramer, Bridgette L. Tonnsen, Stephen Lazoritz, David Palm and R. David Ekstrom. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, Medical Law Review, Applied Nursing Research and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact