Mark William Lopes

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark William Lopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biological Psychiatry 231
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 119
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 434
  • Developmental Neuroscience 67
  • Neurology 109
Replace Regina Pessoa‐Pureur with:
Regina Pessoa‐Pureur Brazil
Trinh T. Tran United States
Liqin Zhao United States
Gianfranco Olivieri Switzerland
Rubén Antonio Vázquez‐Roque Mexico
Amandine Grimm Switzerland
Irena Nalepa Poland
Beata Legutko Poland
Agnieszka Wąsik Poland
Mark William Lopes relative to Regina Pessoa‐Pureur Brazil Regina Pessoa‐Pureur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Regina Pessoa‐Pureur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark William Lopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark William Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark William Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark William Lopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark William Lopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark William Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark William Lopes. The network helps show where Mark William Lopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark William Lopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark William Lopes Line = papers co-authored together Mark William Lopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201388
2 201270
3 201365
4 201559
5 201256
6 201656
7 201152
8 201547
9 201640
10 201434
11 201434
12 201633
13 201533
14 201232
15 201830
16 201528
17 201225
18 201824
19 201423
20 201122

About Mark William Lopes

Mark William Lopes is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Trace Elements in Health (7 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (231 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (119 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (434 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (67 citations) and Neurology (109 citations). Mark William Lopes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rodrigo Bainy Leal, Filipe Marques Gonçalves, Ana Lúcia S. Rodrigues, Vivian B. Neis, Roger Walz, Rui Daniel Prediger, Tanara V. Peres, Ana Paula Costa, Fabiano Mendes de Córdova and Marcelo Farina. Their work appears in journals such as Neurochemical Research, Molecular Neurobiology, Behavioural Brain Research, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior and Neurotoxicity Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact