Stephen E. Johnson

1.2k citations
44 papers · 958 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Johnson

43 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Inorganic Chemistry 372
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 306
  • Organic Chemistry 292
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 57
  • Pharmaceutical Science 37
Replace H. Gerding with:
H. Gerding Germany
В. Н. Калинин Russia
Claude Picard France
T. D. SMITH United States
Kebede Beshah United States
M. Shporer Israel
Gordon C. Campbell United States
Gabriel A. Elgavish United States
Jonathan Bould United Kingdom
Elena G. Kononova Russia
Stephen E. Johnson relative to H. Gerding Germany H. Gerding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Gerding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Johnson. The network helps show where Stephen E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197172
2 198968
3 199157
4 199151
5 199251
6 198950
7 197846
8 199243
9 199640
10 198940
11 199238
12 198936
13 199234
14 199333
15 201430
16 198929
17 199229
18 198928
19 199220
20 199419

About Stephen E. Johnson

Stephen E. Johnson is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Inorganic Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Boron Compounds in Chemistry (11 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (5 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (5 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (4 papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (4 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (4 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (372 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (306 citations), Organic Chemistry (292 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (57 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (37 citations). Stephen E. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Frederick Hawthorne, Carolyn B. Knobler, Frank A. Gomez, Robert R. Holmes, Roberta O. Day, E.F. Domino, Rajesh Khattar, J.A.W. Wildsmith, David T. Brown and D. H. Paul. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organometallics, Evolution and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact