Stephen James

34 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers

Stephen James
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 307
  • Occupational Therapy 80
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 118
  • Health 71
  • Political Science and International Relations 182
Replace Edna R. Fiedler with:
Edna R. Fiedler United States
Ian Macdonald United Kingdom
Elaine Cristina Marqueze Brazil
E. Harrison United States
Kyeong‐Sook Choi South Korea
Josie Milligan-Saville Australia
Lauren Godier‐McBard United Kingdom
Peter L. Hays Canada
Ingvild Saksvik‐Lehouillier Norway
Guido L. R. Godaert Netherlands
Stephen James relative to Edna R. Fiedler United States Edna R. Fiedler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.3×
Edna R. Fiedler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen James. The network helps show where Stephen James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen James Line = papers co-authored together Stephen James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017348
2 201699
3 202054
4 201443
5 201535
6 201829
7 201724
8 201722
9 202220
10 202117
11 201815
12 202013
13 201913
14 201510
15 201710
16 20158
17 20238
18
ITS BENEFITS: REVIEW OF EVALUATION METHODS AND REPORTED BENEFITS
19988
19 20237
20 20197

About Stephen James

Stephen James is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (9 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (9 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (307 citations), Occupational Therapy (80 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (118 citations), Health (71 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (182 citations). Stephen James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Benin. Frequent co-authors include Lois James, Hans P. A. Van Dongen, Kimberly A. Honn, Shobhan Gaddameedhi, Bryan Vila, Patricia Butterfield, Marian Wilson, Nathaniel Brown, Mark VanDam and Chris Berka. Their work appears in journals such as Policing An International Journal, Journal of Experimental Criminology, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Police Quarterly and Criminology & Public Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact