Jana Jünger

4.3k citations
129 papers · 3.0k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Jana Jünger

121 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Jana Jünger
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Family Practice 659
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.5k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 708
  • General Health Professions 785
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 425
Replace Denyse Richardson with:
Denyse Richardson Canada
William Iobst United States
Deepak Dath Canada
Samuel DeMaria United States
Rachel Yudkowsky United States
Bo Christensen Denmark
Ingrid Philibert United States
Jennifer R. Kogan United States
D. Michael Elnicki United States
Robert Englander United States
Jana Jünger relative to Denyse Richardson Canada Denyse Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Denyse Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jana Jünger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jana Jünger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jana Jünger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jana Jünger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jana Jünger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jana Jünger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jana Jünger. The network helps show where Jana Jünger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jana Jünger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jana Jünger Line = papers co-authored together Jana Jünger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004171
2 2011143
3 2010117
4 2015116
5 2008111
6 2007100
7 200595
8 201188
9 201484
10 201470
11 200868
12 200565
13 201264
14 201563
15 201661
16 200961
17 200760
18 200956
19 201354
20 200549

About Jana Jünger

Jana Jünger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 129 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (53 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (27 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (21 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (17 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (14 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (14 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (14 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (659 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.5k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (708 citations), General Health Professions (785 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (425 citations). Jana Jünger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Nikendei, Wolfgang Herzog, Jobst‐Hendrik Schultz, Peter Weyrich, Dieter Schellberg, Markus Schrauth, Markus Krautter, Andreas Möltner, Hans Martin Bosse and Stephan Zipfel. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Psychosomatic Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact