Mark King
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Papers in
-
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 2
- Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy 1
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 3
- Co-authors
- Sam Winter (3 shared papers)Beverley Webster (2 shared papers)Bob Fox (3 shared papers)Daniel Churchill (3 shared papers)Li Ling (1 shared paper)Paul Bergey (1 shared paper)Ling Li (1 shared paper)Yan Zhang (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Mark King
14 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Gender Studies 77
- Social Psychology 109
- Education 102
- Sociology and Political Science 143
- Clinical Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Mark King
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark King. The network helps show where Mark King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 13 | New Technologies in the Classroom: How We Can Understand the Link Between Strong Pedagogy, Student Learning, and the Application of New Technologies | 2012 | 1 |
| 14 | Maintaining a 'digital profile' under web 2.0 | 2013 | 1 |
| 15 | The Role of Secure Knowledge in Enabling Year 7 to Write Essays on Magna Carta. | 2015 | 0 |
About Mark King
Mark King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Information Systems, Clinical Psychology and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (77 citations), Social Psychology (109 citations), Education (102 citations), Sociology and Political Science (143 citations) and Clinical Psychology (53 citations). Mark King has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Sam Winter, Beverley Webster, Bob Fox, Daniel Churchill, Li Ling, Paul Bergey, Ling Li, Yan Zhang, Jian Xu and Baoci Shan. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Education, Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, International Journal of Sexual Health, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education and International Journal of Transgenderism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.