Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

9.8k citations
534 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

493 papers receiving 8.8k citations

Peers

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Computer Science Applications 1.7k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.5k
  • Information Systems and Management 1.3k
  • Education 5.1k
  • Communication 912
Replace Journal of Information Technology Education Research with:
Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures United States
Practical assessment, research & evaluation United States
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) United States
Performance Improvement Quarterly United States
The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances United States
Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States
Active Learning in Higher Education United Kingdom
International Journal of Research & Method in Education United Kingdom
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing United States
Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education relative to Journal of Information Technology Education Research United States Journal of Information Technology Education Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Journal of Information Technology Education Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education.

About Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

The 534 papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (165 papers), Computer Science Applications (70 papers), Software (43 papers), Management Information Systems (80 papers) and Education (227 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Marketing Education (158 papers), Online and Blended Learning (108 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (72 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (48 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (46 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (45 papers), Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (43 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education are Nicholas Jeremy Ashill, Sean B. Eom, H. Joseph Wen, Thomas F. Hawk, Amit Jasvant Shah, Anita Lee‐Post, Clyde W. Holsapple, Mark Simkin, William L. Kuechler Jr. and J. Ben Arbaugh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact