Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

546 papers and 6.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 546 papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (279 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (167 papers) and Social Psychology (153 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (119 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (104 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry are Ee Heok Kua, Helen Chiu, Adrienne Brown, Alexandra Parker, Simon Rice, Debra Rickwood, David Casey, Yingli Zhang, Wei Liang and Lijuan Shen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia-Pacific Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia-Pacific Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025