Stephen Barker

2.3k citations
68 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Barker

56 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Stephen Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • History and Philosophy of Science 367
  • Philosophy 425
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 413
  • General Psychology 24
  • Computer Science Applications 66
Replace Newton Garver with:
Newton Garver United States
Brian Loar United States
John Perry United States
Robert Kirk United Kingdom
Erwin Panofsky Germany
Richard Wollheim United States
Robin Le Poidevin United Kingdom
Joseph C. Pitt United States
Catherine Z. Elgin United States
Eugen Fink Germany
Stephen Barker relative to Newton Garver United States Newton Garver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Newton Garver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Barker. The network helps show where Stephen Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Barker Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1959150
2
Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise
2010150
3 1970128
4 200387
5 201158
6 200058
7 199946
8
Tracheal injury after endotracheal intubation and anesthesia in rabbits.
200640
9 196639
10 195839
11 201338
12 200930
13 200328
14 201226
15 200424
16 196024
17 196419
18
Signs of Change Premodern-->Modern-->Postmodern
199618
19 200017
20 195916

About Stephen Barker

Stephen Barker is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (8 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (367 citations), Philosophy (425 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (413 citations), General Psychology (24 citations) and Computer Science Applications (66 citations). Stephen Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Stiegler, Peter Achinstein, Robert Ackermann, Herbert Feigl, Grover Maxwell, Michael Scriven, Mark Jago, Phil Dowe, Georg Henrik von Wright and Israel Scheffler. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy, Mind and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact