Robert Kirk

2.8k citations
46 papers · 1.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Kirk

41 papers receiving 1k citations

Robert Kirk's Hit Papers

CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY 1970 · 874 citations
8740+18+37Years since publication250500750

Peers

Robert Kirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 442
  • Philosophy 273
  • Language and Linguistics 192
  • History and Philosophy of Science 107
  • Cultural Studies 73
Replace Christian J. W. Kloesel with:
Christian J. W. Kloesel United States
Eric Margolis United Kingdom
Nathan Houser United States
ROY A. SORENSEN United States
Marcelo Dascal Israel
Jane E. Lewin
Rush Rhees United Kingdom
Keith Lehrer United States
Edmund L. Gettier United States
Stephen P. Norris Canada
Robert Kirk relative to Christian J. W. Kloesel United States Christian J. W. Kloesel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Christian J. W. Kloesel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Kirk. The network helps show where Robert Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Robert Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Kirk Line = papers co-authored together Robert Kirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY
Hit paper breakdown →
1970874
2 197492
3 200568
4 199664
5 199243
6 197441
7 201318
8 199617
9 200417
10 200215
11 197912
12 199612
13 199611
14 199410
15 19939
16 19999
17 20079
18 19866
19 19675
20 19695

About Robert Kirk

Robert Kirk is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and General Social Sciences, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (34 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (442 citations), Philosophy (273 citations), Language and Linguistics (192 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (107 citations) and Cultural Studies (73 citations). Robert Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Poland, Peter Carruthers, Robert B. Brandom, Gerald Doppelt, Akeel Bilgrami, Stathis Psillos, Colin McGinn and Owen Flanagan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis, Mind, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact