Mark Graham
Impact in
- Industrial relations top 0.02%
- Legal and Labor Studies
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.02%
- Geographic Information Systems Studies
Papers in
-
- Geographic Information Systems Studies 32
-
- Information Society and Technology Trends 20
- Co-authors
- Vili Lehdonvirta (9 shared papers)Isis Hjorth (8 shared papers)Matthew Zook (19 shared papers)Alex J. Wood (5 shared papers)Mohammad Amir Anwar (17 shared papers)Taylor Shelton (9 shared papers)Fabian Ferrari (15 shared papers)Scott A. Hale (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (10 papers)Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (4 papers)Global Networks (3 papers)Geoforum (3 papers)The Professional Geographer (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Mark Graham
154 papers receiving 8.7k citations
Mark Graham's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Industrial relations 259
- Geography, Planning and Development 1.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 4.7k
- Media Technology 668
- Transportation 446
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Graham
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Graham. The network helps show where Mark Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Graham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 1347 |
| 2 | Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 734 |
| 3 | Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 612 |
| 4 | Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 288 |
| 5 | Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 268 |
| 6 | Networked but Commodified: The (Dis)Embeddedness of Digital Labour in the Gig Economy Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 266 |
| 7 | Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 266 |
| 8 | Where in the World Are You? Geolocation and Language Identification in Twitter Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 244 |
| 9 | 2012 | 243 | |
| 10 | Hidden transcripts of the gig economy: labour agency and the new art of resistance among African gig workers Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 240 |
| 11 | The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 230 |
| 12 | Mapping the data shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the sociospatial dimensions of ‘big data’ Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 209 |
| 13 | 2013 | 206 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 196 | |
| 15 | Regulate, replicate, and resist – the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 185 |
| 16 | 2007 | 184 | |
| 17 | Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 178 |
| 18 | 2007 | 168 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 165 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 143 |
About Mark Graham
Mark Graham is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Social Sciences, Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 171 papers that have together received 9.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Economy and Work Transformation (67 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (32 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (21 papers), Information Society and Technology Trends (20 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (11 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Economic Growth and Development (7 papers) and Legal and Labor Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial relations (259 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (1.4k citations), Sociology and Political Science (4.7k citations), Media Technology (668 citations) and Transportation (446 citations). Mark Graham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Vili Lehdonvirta, Isis Hjorth, Matthew Zook, Alex J. Wood, Mohammad Amir Anwar, Taylor Shelton, Fabian Ferrari, Scott A. Hale, Ate Poorthuis and Matthew W. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Global Networks, Geoforum and The Professional Geographer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.