CBE—Life Sciences Education

50.6k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Career Development and Diversity
  • Education top 1%
    • Innovative Teaching Methods
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
    • Online and Blended Learning

Papers in

    • Career Development and Diversity 285
    • Innovative Teaching Methods 366
    • Science Education and Pedagogy 285
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 138
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices 130

CBE—Life Sciences Education

1.2k papers receiving 47.6k citations

Peers

CBE—Life Sciences Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Safety Research 9.0k
  • Education 30.9k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 9.8k
  • Media Technology 5.0k
  • Computer Science Applications 2.3k
Replace Research in Science Education with:
Research in Science Education Australia
Journal of Science Education and Technology United States
Research in Higher Education United States
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education United Kingdom
Harvard Educational Review United States
Learning and Instruction Germany
Educational Psychology Review United States
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education United States
Educational Psychologist United States
Journal of Science Teacher Education United States
CBE—Life Sciences Education relative to Research in Science Education Australia Research in Science Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Research in Science Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in CBE—Life Sciences Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CBE—Life Sciences Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CBE—Life Sciences Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education.

About CBE—Life Sciences Education

The 1.3k papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education in the last decades have received a total of 50.6k indexed citations . Papers published in CBE—Life Sciences Education usually cover Safety Research (310 papers), Education (821 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (330 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (62 papers) and Media Technology (109 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching Methods (366 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (285 papers), Career Development and Diversity (285 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (192 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (189 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (143 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (138 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CBE—Life Sciences Education are Kimberly D. Tanner, Sara E. Brownell, Jane E. Caldwell, Cynthia J. Brame, David Lopatto, Sarah L. Eddy, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Erin L. Dolan, William J. Boone and Michelle K. Smith.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact