Mark Gorman
Impact in
- Emergency Medical Services top 1%
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Papers in
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 1
- Ethics in Clinical Research 1
- Surgery 1
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Co-authors
- Paul Mansfield (1 shared paper)Dawn Camp-Sorrell (1 shared paper)James C. Wade (1 shared paper)Diane Cope (1 shared paper)Bassel F. El‐Rayes (1 shared paper)Charles A. Schiffer (1 shared paper)Pamela B. Mangu (1 shared paper)Jennifer A. Ligibel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)BMC Medical Research Methodology (1 paper)Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (1 paper)ResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University) (1 paper)Journal of Pioneering Medical Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark Gorman
5 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Emergency Medical Services 182
- Internal Medicine 34
- Nephrology 15
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 7
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 33
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gorman
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gorman. The network helps show where Mark Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gorman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 248 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 4 | Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) as an Assessment Tool for Surgical Trainees | 2013 | 4 |
| 5 | In care, in school: giving voice to children and young people in care | 2013 | 2 |
About Mark Gorman
Mark Gorman is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (182 citations), Internal Medicine (34 citations), Nephrology (15 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (7 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (33 citations). Mark Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Mansfield, Dawn Camp-Sorrell, James C. Wade, Diane Cope, Bassel F. El‐Rayes, Charles A. Schiffer, Pamela B. Mangu, Jennifer A. Ligibel, Mark N. Levine and James L. Wade. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, ResearchSPAce (Bath Spa University) and Journal of Pioneering Medical Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.