Diane Cope

38 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

Diane Cope
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Emergency Medical Services 212
  • Internal Medicine 35
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Oncology 153
  • Otorhinolaryngology 14
Replace Aurélie Bourmaud with:
Aurélie Bourmaud France
Michael J. Cahalane United States
Jeffrey M. Ashburner United States
Jesus G. Ulloa United States
Sandra R. DiBrito United States
Shunzo Koizumi Japan
Samuel Cykert United States
David Berger United States
Elena Pizzo United Kingdom
Amado Alejandro Báez United States
Diane Cope relative to Aurélie Bourmaud France Aurélie Bourmaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Aurélie Bourmaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Cope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Cope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Cope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Cope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Cope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Cope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Cope. The network helps show where Diane Cope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Cope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Cope Line = papers co-authored together Diane Cope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013248
2 199557
3 201434
4 201932
5
Advanced practice issues: results of the ONS Advanced Practice Nursing survey.
200232
6 202027
7 202025
8
Access Device Guidelines: Recommendations for Nursing Practice and Education
201023
9 200321
10 201119
11 201419
12 201517
13 199216
14 202014
15 200213
16 200112
17
An evidence-based approach to the treatment and care of the older adult with cancer
200611
18 201410
19 20229
20 20198

About Diane Cope

Diane Cope is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers) and Family Support in Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (212 citations), Internal Medicine (35 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Oncology (153 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (14 citations). Diane Cope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Camp-Sorrell, Paul Mansfield, James C. Wade, Bassel F. El‐Rayes, Charles A. Schiffer, Pamela B. Mangu, Jennifer A. Ligibel, Mark N. Levine, Mark Gorman and Marie Lynch. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical journal of oncology nursing, Oncology nursing forum, Seminars in Oncology Nursing, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact