Mark Freeman

24 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Mark Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Orthodontics 57
  • Oral Surgery 43
  • Social Psychology 107
  • Education 116
  • Architecture 6
Replace K. Lynn Taylor with:
K. Lynn Taylor Canada
Linda H. Lewis United States
Linda Riebe Australia
Diane F. Baker United States
Judy R. Van Doorn United States
Anna Kayes United States
Florin D. Salajan United States
Janet G. Donald Canada
Carole J. Makela United States
John M. Kennedy United States
Mark Freeman relative to K. Lynn Taylor Canada K. Lynn Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
K. Lynn Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Freeman. The network helps show where Mark Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Mark Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199770
2 200163
3 199839
4 201537
5 201335
6 199631
7 200431
8
Completing the Learning Cycle: The Role of Formative Feedback When Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Teamwork and Engagement
200630
9 201524
10 200823
11 199913
12 20019
13 20098
14 20106
15
From substance to story
20014
16
Accreditation Pathways for Accounting Programs in Australia: Changes to the Regulatory Environment
20124
17 20103
18 20203
19
The case for assessable in-class team-based learning
20122
20 20082

About Mark Freeman

Mark Freeman is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (2 papers), Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (2 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (57 citations), Oral Surgery (43 citations), Social Psychology (107 citations), Education (116 citations) and Architecture (6 citations). Mark Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Prashant Bordia, Paul Blayney, Gerald W. Harrington, Jack I. Nicholls, William L. Kydd, Keith Willey, Phil Hancock, Paul De Lange, Kim Watty and Brendan O’Connell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, History of Education Review, Journal of Accounting Education and Journal of Endodontics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact