Mark Dale
Impact in
- Urology top 5%
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Papers in
-
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 2
-
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 1
- Co-authors
- Ebrahim Naderali (1 shared paper)Steve Higham (2 shared papers)Trevor J. Crawford (2 shared papers)Reiner Tretter (2 shared papers)Gerhard Compion (2 shared papers)Adrian Wagg (2 shared papers)Alistair Burns (2 shared papers)Barbara M. Taylor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)Disability & Society (1 paper)Current Medical Research and Opinion (1 paper)European Urology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark Dale
11 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Urology 78
- Human-Computer Interaction 51
- Psychiatry and Mental health 108
- Neurology 57
- Sensory Systems 28
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dale
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dale. The network helps show where Mark Dale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Dale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 163 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 0 |
About Mark Dale
Mark Dale is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Urology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (1 paper), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper) and Disability Education and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (78 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (108 citations), Neurology (57 citations) and Sensory Systems (28 citations). Mark Dale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ebrahim Naderali, Steve Higham, Trevor J. Crawford, Reiner Tretter, Gerhard Compion, Adrian Wagg, Alistair Burns, Barbara M. Taylor, Julie Morris and Sandip Shaunak. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Disability & Society, Current Medical Research and Opinion and European Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.