Francesca Conte

1.7k citations
69 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Francesca Conte

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Francesca Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 548
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 488
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 328
  • Neurology 142
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 98
Replace Kwang Ik Yang with:
Kwang Ik Yang South Korea
Primavera A. Spagnolo United States
Savvas Papacostas Cyprus
Jeff Boissoneault United States
Chadi A. Calarge United States
P. Hardy France
R. Buller Germany
Jeremy A. Elman United States
Clarissa Trzesniak Brazil
Wei‐Lieh Huang Taiwan
Francesca Conte relative to Kwang Ik Yang South Korea Kwang Ik Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Kwang Ik Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Francesca Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca Conte. The network helps show where Francesca Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Francesca Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Francesca Conte Line = papers co-authored together Francesca Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013135
2 2015102
3 202087
4 201674
5 201573
6 201248
7 201544
8 201444
9 201642
10 201142
11 201434
12 201432
13 201423
14 202221
15 201519
16 202119
17 202119
18 202019
19 201218
20 200617

About Francesca Conte

Francesca Conte is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (30 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (29 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (15 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (7 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (548 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (488 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (328 citations), Neurology (142 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (98 citations). Francesca Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gianluca Ficca, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Alessandro Tessitore, Antonio Russo, Alfonso Giordano, Fiorenza Giganti, Fabrizio Esposito, Daniele Corbo, Giuseppina Caiazzo and Laura Marcuccio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sleep Research, The Journal of Headache and Pain, Neurological Sciences, Sleep Medicine and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact