Mark Cobb

2.2k citations
46 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Cobb

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Cobb
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Health 771
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 518
  • Emergency Medical Services 85
  • General Health Professions 190
  • Human-Computer Interaction 44
Replace Wilfred McSherry with:
Wilfred McSherry United Kingdom
Dania Comparcini Italy
Genevieve N. Thompson Canada
Ann Harrington Australia
Sarah J. Yardley United Kingdom
Kent S. Lindqvist Sweden
Jocelyn Cornwell United Kingdom
Josephine Enyonam Ocloo United Kingdom
Elisabeth Coyne Australia
Michelle Kelly Australia
Mark Cobb relative to Wilfred McSherry United Kingdom Wilfred McSherry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Wilfred McSherry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cobb. The network helps show where Mark Cobb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Cobb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Cobb Line = papers co-authored together Mark Cobb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997301
2 2012207
3 2013148
4 2011112
5 201696
6 201294
7 201480
8
The spiritual challenge of health care
199874
9 201269
10 201460
11
The Dying Soul: Spiritual Care at the End of Life
200146
12 201340
13 201239
14 201033
15 200431
16 200324
17 201521
18 201320
19 200619
20 201116

About Mark Cobb

Mark Cobb is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (22 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers), Palliative and Oncologic Care (8 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (771 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (518 citations), Emergency Medical Services (85 citations), General Health Professions (190 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (44 citations). Mark Cobb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Forman, Christina M. Puchalski, Bruce D Rumbold, Clare Gardiner, Merryn Gott, Christine Ingleton, Mari Lloyd‐Williams, Daniel Wolstenholme, Simon J. Bowen and Andy Dearden. Their work appears in journals such as Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Physiotherapy and British Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact