Mark Cobb

49 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Cobb
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Health 724
  • Clinical Psychology 417
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 526
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • General Health Professions 274
Replace Anita Molzahn with:
Anita Molzahn Canada
Daniel H. Grossoehme United States
Karen Adams Australia
Jennifer Chipps South Africa
Nancy R. Hooyman United States
Kiek Tates Netherlands
Αnastas Philalithis Greece
Hee Sun Kang South Korea
Genevieve Thompson Canada
Anne E. Norris United States
Mark Cobb relative to Anita Molzahn Canada Anita Molzahn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anita Molzahn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cobb. The network helps show where Mark Cobb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Cobb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Cobb Line = papers co-authored together Mark Cobb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997250
2 2012207
3 1997162
4 2013141
5 2011109
6 201293
7 201689
8
The spiritual challenge of health care
199877
9 201266
10 201458
11
The Dying Soul: Spiritual Care at the End of Life
200150
12 201239
13 201338
14 201033
15 200430
16 200325
17 202022
18 201520
19 201320
20 200618

About Mark Cobb

Mark Cobb is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (19 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Persona Design and Applications (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (724 citations), Clinical Psychology (417 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (526 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations) and General Health Professions (274 citations). Mark Cobb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Dyson, Dawn Forman, Bruce Rumbold, Christina M. Puchalski, Merryn Gott, Clare Gardiner, Christine Ingleton, Mari Lloyd‐Williams, Daniel Wolstenholme and Simon Bowen. Their work appears in journals such as Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Palliative Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact