Mark Cobb

42 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Mark Cobb
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Health 661
  • Clinical Psychology 379
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 492
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • General Health Professions 256
Replace Daniel H. Grossoehme with:
Daniel H. Grossoehme United States
Karen Adams Australia
Kiek Tates Netherlands
Jennifer Chipps South Africa
Joanne Olson Canada
Hee Sun Kang South Korea
Genevieve Thompson Canada
Αnastas Philalithis Greece
Anne Bruce Canada
Karen J. Aroian United States
Mark Cobb relative to Daniel H. Grossoehme United States Daniel H. Grossoehme's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Daniel H. Grossoehme · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cobb. The network helps show where Mark Cobb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Cobb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Cobb Line = papers co-authored together Mark Cobb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997243
2 2012187
3 1997153
4 2013130
5 2011104
6 201290
7 201688
8
The spiritual challenge of health care
199875
9 201457
10 201256
11
The Dying Soul: Spiritual Care at the End of Life
200149
12 201338
13 201238
14 200429
15 201025
16 200324
17 201320
18 202019
19 201519
20 200617

About Mark Cobb

Mark Cobb is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Persona Design and Applications (3 papers) and Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (661 citations), Clinical Psychology (379 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (492 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations) and General Health Professions (256 citations). Mark Cobb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Dyson, Dawn Forman, Bruce Rumbold, Christina M. Puchalski, Merryn Gott, Clare Gardiner, Christine Ingleton, Mari Lloyd‐Williams, Daniel Wolstenholme and Simon Bowen. Their work appears in journals such as Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact