Bill Noble

1.6k citations
50 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Bill Noble

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bill Noble
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 628
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 46
  • General Health Professions 173
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 36
  • Clinical Psychology 142
Replace Ágnes Csikós with:
Ágnes Csikós Hungary
James Hallenbeck United States
Cony Rolón United States
Olav Lindqvist Sweden
Karen S. Ogle United States
Carina Lundh Hagelin Sweden
Stephanie Stiel Germany
Susan Ladwig United States
Pedro Emilio Perez‐Cruz Chile
Huda Abu‐Saad Huijer Lebanon
Bill Noble relative to Ágnes Csikós Hungary Ágnes Csikós's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ágnes Csikós · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Noble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Noble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Noble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Noble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Noble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Noble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Noble. The network helps show where Bill Noble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bill Noble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bill Noble Line = papers co-authored together Bill Noble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004304
2 201290
3 200583
4 200865
5 200550
6 200349
7 200448
8 200645
9 200943
10 201343
11 201338
12 200430
13 200627
14 201426
15 201322
16 201421
17 201521
18 201320
19 201418
20 201516

About Bill Noble

Bill Noble is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Oncology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (27 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (628 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (46 citations), General Health Professions (173 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (36 citations) and Clinical Psychology (142 citations). Bill Noble has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nisar Ahmed, David Clark, Sheila Payne, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Janine Bestall, Jane Seymour, Christine Ingleton, Merryn Gott, Clare Gardiner and Philippa Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, International Journal of Palliative Nursing, Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and BMC Palliative Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact