Mark C. Young
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 10%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Papers in
-
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 6
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 2
- Genetics 4
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 4
- Co-authors
- Peter H. von Hippel (10 shared papers)Gijs J. L. Wuite (1 shared paper)David Keller (1 shared paper)Carlos Bustamante (1 shared paper)Julianne J. Sando (2 shared papers)Dorothy A. Erie (1 shared paper)Michael K. Reddy (1 shared paper)Paola Pietroni (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Molecular Biology (5 papers)Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Biochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark C. Young
12 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Structural Biology 22
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Genetics 357
- Ecology 207
- Biophysics 30
Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Young
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Young. The network helps show where Mark C. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 402 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 258 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 152 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 90 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 13 | In vitro and in vivo evidence for the similarity between phorbol ester receptors and protein kinase c. Abstr. | 1983 | 1 |
About Mark C. Young
Mark C. Young is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (6 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (22 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Genetics (357 citations), Ecology (207 citations) and Biophysics (30 citations). Mark C. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. von Hippel, Gijs J. L. Wuite, David Keller, Carlos Bustamante, Julianne J. Sando, Dorothy A. Erie, Michael K. Reddy, Paola Pietroni, Gary J. Latham and Steven E. Weitzel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Biology, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.