Marius Mather
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 6
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 4
- Community Health and Development 3
- Co-authors
- Nicola C. Newton (11 shared papers)Maree Teesson (10 shared papers)Katrina E. Champion (7 shared papers)Tim Slade (9 shared papers)Cath Chapman (6 shared papers)Lexine Stapinski (5 shared papers)Frances Kay‐Lambkin (1 shared paper)Patricia Conrod (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Lancet Digital Health (2 papers)Addiction (2 papers)Cortex (1 paper)Journal of Sleep Research (1 paper)Frontiers in Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Marius Mather
17 papers receiving 357 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Applied Psychology 62
- Clinical Psychology 154
- General Health Professions 114
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
- Health 26
Countries citing papers authored by Marius Mather
This map shows the geographic impact of Marius Mather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marius Mather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marius Mather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marius Mather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marius Mather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marius Mather. The network helps show where Marius Mather may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marius Mather, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Marius Mather
Marius Mather is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (154 citations), General Health Professions (114 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations) and Health (26 citations). Marius Mather has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicola C. Newton, Maree Teesson, Katrina E. Champion, Tim Slade, Cath Chapman, Lexine Stapinski, Frances Kay‐Lambkin, Patricia Conrod, Bonnie Spring and Emma Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Digital Health, Addiction, Cortex, Journal of Sleep Research and Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.