Cortex

5.8k papers and 203.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.8k papers published in Cortex in the last decades have received a total of 203.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Cortex usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (4.9k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.0k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (912 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1.3k papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (996 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (951 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cortex are Hazel E. Nelson, Ennio De Renzi, Guido Gainotti, Marco Catani, Doreen Kimura, P. Faglioni, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten, Elizabeth K. Warrington, Robert D. Nebes and Arthur L. Benton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cortex

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cortex.

Countries where authors publish in Cortex

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cortex more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025