Malcolm J. Young

729 citations
15 papers · 495 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm J. Young

13 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Malcolm J. Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Gender Studies 112
  • Strategy and Management 98
  • Communication 43
  • Management Science and Operations Research 75
  • Political Science and International Relations 144
Replace Palle Damkjær Rasmussen with:
Palle Damkjær Rasmussen Denmark
Rhetta Long Standifer United States
Carol Ekinsmyth United Kingdom
Alexandra Bristow United Kingdom
Cathrine Filstad Norway
L. Harmon Zeigler United States
Robert Fitzgerald United Kingdom
Rand W. Ressler United States
Koya Azumi United States
Laura Dobusch Netherlands
Malcolm J. Young relative to Palle Damkjær Rasmussen Denmark Palle Damkjær Rasmussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Palle Damkjær Rasmussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm J. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm J. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm J. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm J. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm J. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm J. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm J. Young. The network helps show where Malcolm J. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm J. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm J. Young Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm J. Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
An Inside Job: Policing and Police Culture in Britain
1991151
2 200485
3 200261
4 199950
5 200341
6 199527
7 199327
8 199526
9
In the Sticks: Cultural Identity in a Rural Police Force
199418
10 19953
11 19902
12 20062
13 20131
14 20121
15 20200

About Malcolm J. Young

Malcolm J. Young is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Music and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Rural development and sustainability (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (112 citations), Strategy and Management (98 citations), Communication (43 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (75 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (144 citations). Malcolm J. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include David Partington, Sergio Pellegrinelli, Gary Armstrong, David Tranfield, Jonathan Sapsed, John Bessant, Dick Hobbs and Tim May. Their work appears in journals such as Anthropology Today, International Journal of Management Reviews, Sport in Society, International Journal of Innovation Management and Journal of Gender Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact