Countries where authors publish in Anthropology Today
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropology Today. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropology Today with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropology Today more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropology Today. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropology Today.
About Anthropology Today
The 1.5k papers published in Anthropology Today in the last decades have received a total of 12.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Anthropology Today usually cover Anthropology (321 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (91 papers), Space and Planetary Science (17 papers), Sociology and Political Science (488 papers) and Museology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (154 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (127 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (66 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (61 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (50 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (39 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (36 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropology Today are Didier Fassin, Pat Caplan, Terence Turner, Susan Wright, Nancy Scheper‐Hughes, Roberto J. González, Richard Handler, Bruno Latour, Jonathan Benthall and Tim Ingold.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.