International Journal of Management Reviews

88.6k citations
604 papers · · active since 1999

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Management Reviews

594 papers receiving 82.2k citations

Peers

International Journal of Management Reviews
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Strategy and Management 33.8k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 20k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 11.2k
  • Marketing 7.9k
  • Management Information Systems 5.3k
Replace Organizational Research Methods with:
Organizational Research Methods United States
Academy of Management Annals United States
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems United States
International Journal of Service Industry Management United States
Journal of service management United States
Advances in experimental social psychology United States
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management United States
Management and Organization Review China
European Management Review United Kingdom
Journal of Interactive Marketing United States
International Journal of Management Reviews relative to Organizational Research Methods United States Organizational Research Methods's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Organizational Research Methods · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Management Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Management Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Management Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews.

About International Journal of Management Reviews

The 604 papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 88.6k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Management Reviews usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (197 papers), Strategy and Management (203 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (69 papers), Management Information Systems (46 papers) and Marketing (29 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (94 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (90 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (41 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (40 papers), International Business and FDI (34 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (27 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (19 papers) and Human Resource and Talent Management (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Management Reviews are Samir K. Srivastava, Kareem M. Shabana, Archie B. Carroll, Catherine L. Wang, Nick Bontis, Martina K. Linnenluecke, Pervaiz K. Ahmed, Andrew D. Brown, Min‐Dong Paul Lee and Richard J. Adams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact