Malcolm Chase
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Irish and British Studies 4
- History 8
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 3
- Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Christopher Shaw (1 shared paper)William Rhodes (1 shared paper)Joel H. Wiener (1 shared paper)J. F. C. Harrison (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (2 papers)Labour History Review (2 papers)Journal of Victorian Culture (2 papers)Past & Present (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Chase
20 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- History 89
- Music 16
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
- Anthropology 37
- Museology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Chase
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Chase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Chase
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Chase. The network helps show where Malcolm Chase may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia | 1989 | 161 |
| 2 | 1967 | 89 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 27 | |
| 5 | Chartism: A New History | 2007 | 26 |
| 6 | Living and Learning: Essays in Honour of J.F.C. Harrison | 1996 | 13 |
| 7 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1820: Disorder and stability in the United Kingdom | 2013 | 5 |
| 13 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 1 |
About Malcolm Chase
Malcolm Chase is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Historical Education Studies Worldwide (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (89 citations), Music (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Anthropology (37 citations) and Museology (13 citations). Malcolm Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Shaw, William Rhodes, Joel H. Wiener and J. F. C. Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Labour History Review, Journal of Victorian Culture, Past & Present and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.