Michael Saler

1.1k citations
19 papers · 468 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices

Papers in

Michael Saler

15 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Michael Saler
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Literature and Literary Theory 132
  • Philosophy 97
  • History 84
  • Cultural Studies 61
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 36
Replace Tom Conley with:
Tom Conley United States
Michael Beehler
Greil Marcus United States
Dagmar C. G. Lorenz United States
Sharon O’Dair United States
Sabine von Dirke United States
Esther Leslie United Kingdom
Hans Bertens Netherlands
Vanessa R. Schwartz United States
Matei Călinescu United States
Michael Saler relative to Tom Conley United States Tom Conley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Tom Conley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Saler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Saler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Saler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Saler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Saler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Saler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Saler. The network helps show where Michael Saler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Michael Saler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Saler Line = papers co-authored together Michael Saler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary Prehistory of Virtual Reality
2011150
2 2006115
3 200339
4 200538
5 200035
6 199927
7 200922
8 200412
9 199811
10 19956
11 19984
12 20143
13 20052
14
Sword for hire
20061
15 20171
16 20111
17 20081
18 20090
19 20140

About Michael Saler

Michael Saler is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 19 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (3 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), French Literature and Poetry (2 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (132 citations), Philosophy (97 citations), History (84 citations), Cultural Studies (61 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (36 citations). Michael Saler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda Dowling and Joshua Landy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Modernism/modernity, The Historical Journal, Philosophy and literature and Theory and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact