Labour History Review

366 papers and 794 indexed citations

About

The 366 papers published in Labour History Review in the last decades have received a total of 794 indexed citations. Papers published in Labour History Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (131 papers), Political Science and International Relations (106 papers) and History (82 papers) specifically the topics of Political and Economic history of UK and US (72 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (57 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labour History Review are Arthur McIvor, Michael Rowlinson, John McIlroy, Jim Tomlinson, Jane Humphries, John K. Walton, David Gilbert, Momin Rahman, J. A. Millar and Alan Campbell.

In The Last Decade

Labour History Review

168 papers receiving 475 citations

Fields of papers published in Labour History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labour History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labour History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Labour History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labour History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labour History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labour History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026