Maciej Ma̧czyński
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maciej Ma̧czyński
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maciej Ma̧czyński. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maciej Ma̧czyński based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maciej Ma̧czyński. Maciej Ma̧czyński is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Maciej Ma̧czyński
32 papers receiving 296 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Maciej Ma̧czyński
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maciej Ma̧czyński. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maciej Ma̧czyński. The network helps show where Maciej Ma̧czyński may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Maciej Ma̧czyński
This map shows the geographic impact of Maciej Ma̧czyński's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maciej Ma̧czyński with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maciej Ma̧czyński more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.