Studia Mathematica

4.4k papers and 55.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Studia Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 55.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Mathematica usually cover Mathematical Physics (2.6k papers), Applied Mathematics (2.3k papers) and Geometry and Topology (815 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Banach Space Theory (1.4k papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (832 papers) and Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (806 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Mathematica are A. Pełczyński, A. Calderón, Ronald R. Coifman, Benjamin Muckenhoupt, Eric T. Sawyer, Albrecht Pietsch, Fuad Kıttaneh, S. Rolewicz, Stanisław Kwapień and A. P. Calderón.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Mathematica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Mathematica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Mathematica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Mathematica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025