Demonstratio Mathematica

2.4k papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica usually cover Applied Mathematics (816 papers), Geometry and Topology (572 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (507 papers) specifically the topics of Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (263 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (206 papers) and Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Demonstratio Mathematica are W. Żakowski, Sever S Dragomir, Valeríu Popa, Simon Fitzpatrick, Zdenka Riečanová, B. G. Pachpatte, Teodor Bulboacă, Nguyen Van Dũng, Dariusz Wardowski and Stanley Gudder.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica.

Countries where authors publish in Demonstratio Mathematica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Demonstratio Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Demonstratio Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Demonstratio Mathematica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025