Colloquium Mathematicum

3.3k papers and 20.4k indexed citations

About

The 3.3k papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum in the last decades have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum usually cover Mathematical Physics (1.3k papers), Geometry and Topology (1.3k papers) and Applied Mathematics (958 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (463 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (378 papers) and Advanced Banach Space Theory (341 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Colloquium Mathematicum are Jan Mycielski, Michael Christ, Péter L. Erdős, Hugo Steinhaus, Piotr Biler, P. Túrán, Władysław Narkiewicz, Ryszard Deszcz, Andrzej Skowroński and Daniel Simson.

In The Last Decade

Colloquium Mathematicum

2.4k papers receiving 14.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum.

Countries where authors publish in Colloquium Mathematicum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Colloquium Mathematicum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Colloquium Mathematicum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colloquium Mathematicum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026