M. Singer

38 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

M. Singer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Information Systems and Management 228
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Safety Research 69
Replace John L. Smith with:
John L. Smith United Kingdom
Brigitte J. C. Claessens Netherlands
Steve Cohn United States
Scott A. Wright United States
Russell Jones United States
Wulf‐Uwe Meyer Germany
Tim V. Eaton United States
Michael E. Hoffman United States
Dominik Vogel Germany
Ludmila Nunes United States
M. Singer relative to John L. Smith United Kingdom John L. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
John L. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Singer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Singer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Singer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Singer. The network helps show where M. Singer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside M. Singer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Singer Line = papers co-authored together M. Singer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
1997101
2 199694
3 202148
4 198947
5 198644
6 202043
7 200029
8 199223
9 201920
10 199820
11 199219
12 198616
13 199716
14 200215
15 201815
16 199913
17 199812
18 201612
19 198612
20 199911

About M. Singer

M. Singer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (5 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (228 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (128 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations) and Safety Research (69 citations). M. Singer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan E. Singer, Thomas Sunn Pedersen, Lester R. LeBlanc, Pierre-Philippe J. Beaujean, Uwe Wenzel, Erwin M. Biebl, Karl M. Strohm, J.-F. Luy�, G. Schlisio and James R. Danielson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Plasma Physics, International Journal of Selection and Assessment and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact