E. Wild

710 citations
12 papers · 570 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

E. Wild

12 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

E. Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 171
  • Social Psychology 117
  • Information Systems and Management 37
  • Metals and Alloys 13
  • Safety Research 40
Replace Harold W. Goldstein with:
Harold W. Goldstein United States
Thomas Watson United States
A. Kidron Israel
David S. Webster United States
Bernd Irmer Australia
Kenneth D. Hill Canada
Scott A. Wright United States
Jason D. White United States
John K. Kennedy United States
Xiao Ping Chen China
E. Wild relative to Harold W. Goldstein United States Harold W. Goldstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Harold W. Goldstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Wild. The network helps show where E. Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside E. Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Wild Line = papers co-authored together E. Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2003353
2 200168
3 200342
4 198223
5 198422
6 200321
7 200012
8 198012
9 198211
10 19903
11 20062
12
On the theory of vibrational relaxation in gases
19641

About E. Wild

E. Wild is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (3 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (1 paper), NMR spectroscopy and applications (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (171 citations), Social Psychology (117 citations), Information Systems and Management (37 citations), Metals and Alloys (13 citations) and Safety Research (40 citations). E. Wild has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include John C. Shaw, Jason A. Colquitt, Thomas Wroblewski, A. Pyzalla, Max Maier, B. Hasse, G. Goerigk, D. van Ormondt, H. Barkhuijsen and R. de Beer. Their work appears in journals such as Wear, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Applied Psychology and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact