M. Brady

12 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

M. Brady
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 163
  • Reproductive Medicine 47
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 52
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 34
Replace Fenella Roseman with:
Fenella Roseman United Kingdom
Ziba Zahiri Iran
Şeyma Yaşar Türkiye
Michał Lipa Poland
Yusaku Moribata Japan
Elisenda Bonet-Carné Spain
Liang Dong China
R.H.F. van Oppenraaij Netherlands
P. Falkensammer United States
Ellen Thiel United States
M. Brady relative to Fenella Roseman United Kingdom Fenella Roseman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Fenella Roseman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Brady. The network helps show where M. Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Brady, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Brady Line = papers co-authored together M. Brady links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2007190
2 200641
3 199633
4
The Availability of Human Tissue for Biomedical Research: The Report and Recommendations of the ECVAM Workshop 32.
200021
5 200016
6 199313
7 201010
8 19866
9 20252
10 20251
11
Services relating to alcohol in indigenous communities: a report to the Office of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Services
19981
12 20051

About M. Brady

M. Brady is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Morphological variations and asymmetry (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1 paper) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (163 citations), Reproductive Medicine (47 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (52 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (34 citations). M. Brady has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Rocereto, David E. Cohn, Robert S. Mannel, Robert Futoran, Aaron H. Wolfson, Olga B. Ioffe, Ruth English, Marius George Linguraru, Kostas Marias and Andrew Zisserman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Medical Image Analysis, Gynecologic Oncology and Journal of Pediatric Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact