C G Marks
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jean K Ritchie (7 shared papers)N. M. Gibbs (3 shared papers)S. Cawthorn (2 shared papers)H E Lockhart-Mummery (1 shared paper)M. Chir (1 shared paper)Dinah V. Parums (1 shared paper)Roger A’Hern (1 shared paper)Martin Cook (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- British journal of surgery (19 papers)Colorectal Disease (6 papers)Gut (3 papers)Histopathology (1 paper)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
C G Marks
51 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Oncology 843
- Surgery 854
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 107
- Rheumatology 83
- Gastroenterology 26
Countries citing papers authored by C G Marks
This map shows the geographic impact of C G Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C G Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C G Marks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C G Marks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C G Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C G Marks. The network helps show where C G Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C G Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 264 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 163 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 138 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 62 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 61 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 59 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 54 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 40 | |
| 13 | Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a prospective study. | 1996 | 37 |
| 14 | 1993 | 36 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 34 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 33 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 28 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 26 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 24 |
About C G Marks
C G Marks is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (19 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (11 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (9 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (8 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (843 citations), Surgery (854 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (107 citations), Rheumatology (83 citations) and Gastroenterology (26 citations). C G Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jean K Ritchie, N. M. Gibbs, S. Cawthorn, H E Lockhart-Mummery, M. Chir, Dinah V. Parums, Roger A’Hern, Martin Cook, A.G. Nicholson and RA Lawrenson. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Colorectal Disease, Gut, Histopathology and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.