Lukas J. Wolf

1.0k citations
29 papers · 666 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Lukas J. Wolf

26 papers receiving 654 citations

Peers

Lukas J. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Applied Psychology 82
  • Social Psychology 228
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 276
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Matt N Williams with:
Matt N Williams New Zealand
Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom
Lauren Howe Switzerland
M.K. Ward United States
Erica Molinario United States
Liat Levontin Israel
Fanli Jia United States
Antonio Aiello Italy
Andrey Lovakov Russia
Kate A. Ratliff United States
Lukas J. Wolf relative to Matt N Williams New Zealand Matt N Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Matt N Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas J. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas J. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas J. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas J. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas J. Wolf. The network helps show where Lukas J. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukas J. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas J. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Lukas J. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018208
2 2020124
3 201769
4 201944
5 201831
6 201627
7 202026
8 201920
9 202017
10 201515
11 202111
12 201811
13 201911
14 20249
15 20179
16 20167
17 20205
18 20234
19 20194
20 20223

About Lukas J. Wolf

Lukas J. Wolf is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (82 citations), Social Psychology (228 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (276 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Lukas J. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul H. P. Hanel, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Gregory R. Maio, Geoffrey Haddock, Netta Weinstein, Antony S. R. Manstead, Andrew Balmford, Mathew P. White, Sophus zu Ermgassen and Uwe Wolfradt. Their work appears in journals such as Social Psychological and Personality Science, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, British Journal of Social Psychology, Environmental Science & Policy and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact