Christopher Schulz

26 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Christopher Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Global and Planetary Change 144
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 71
  • Water Science and Technology 93
  • Ocean Engineering 68
  • Ecology 104
Replace John Dore with:
John Dore Australia
Mira Käkönen Finland
Ryder W. Miller United States
Yorck von Korff France
Rita Padawangi Singapore
Anna Lukasiewicz Australia
Erik Ansink Netherlands
Asheer Rahman United Kingdom
Nadine Heck United States
Stefan Liehr Germany
Christopher Schulz relative to John Dore Australia John Dore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
John Dore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Schulz. The network helps show where Christopher Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Schulz Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201976
2 201666
3 201854
4 201953
5 201937
6 201830
7 201929
8 202129
9 201727
10 201421
11 202119
12 201717
13 201917
14 202015
15 202114
16 201812
17 202411
18 20227
19 20195
20 20223

About Christopher Schulz

Christopher Schulz is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Water Science and Technology, Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 28 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact (11 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (9 papers), Water Resource Management and Quality (5 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers), Wetland Management and Conservation (3 papers), Water resources management and optimization (3 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (144 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (71 citations), Water Science and Technology (93 citations), Ocean Engineering (68 citations) and Ecology (104 citations). Christopher Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Peru and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Julia Martín-Ortega, Klaus Glenk, William Adams, Antônio Augusto Rossotto Ioris, Nina D. Laurie, Katherine H. Roucoux, Ian T. Lawson, Ercília Torres Steinke, Danilo Mesquita Neves and Carlos Hiroo Saito. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, Geographical Journal, Ecology and Society and Renewable Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact