Tim Hopthrow

34 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Tim Hopthrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Psychology 113
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Social Psychology 178
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 97
  • Clinical Psychology 146
Replace Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho with:
Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho Brazil
Lukas J. Wolf United Kingdom
Fabien Girandola France
Song Wu China
Joonha Park Japan
Jacky C. K. Ng Hong Kong
Ryan P. Jacobson United States
Antonio Aiello Italy
Katja Corcoran Austria
Kátia Correa Vione United Kingdom
Tim Hopthrow relative to Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho Brazil Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Hopthrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Hopthrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Hopthrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Hopthrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Hopthrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Hopthrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Hopthrow. The network helps show where Tim Hopthrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Hopthrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Hopthrow Line = papers co-authored together Tim Hopthrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010110
2 201160
3 201649
4 201646
5 201939
6 201430
7 201227
8 200627
9 201726
10 201223
11 201423
12 200720
13 201218
14 201815
15 200413
16 200812
17 202011
18 20188
19 20118
20
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
20208

About Tim Hopthrow

Tim Hopthrow is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (113 citations), General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Social Psychology (178 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations) and Clinical Psychology (146 citations). Tim Hopthrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georgina Randsley de Moura, Dominic Abrams, Rose Meleady, Hanna Zagefka, Rupert Brown, Masi Noor, Nic Hooper, Brian P. Meier, Ulrich Weger and Lorne Hulbert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact