Luis Rojas
Impact in
-
- Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Papers in
-
- Persona Design and Applications 3
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 2
- Usability and User Interface Design 2
-
- Mental Health via Writing 1
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 1
- Co-authors
- Daniela Quiñones (7 shared papers)Rodrigo F. Herrera (1 shared paper)Claudio Cubillos (2 shared papers)O. Martı́nez (1 shared paper)Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon (1 shared paper)Freddy Paz (1 shared paper)Cielo García‐Montero (1 shared paper)Miguel Ángel Martínez‐González (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Sciences (3 papers)Information and Software Technology (1 paper)PeerJ Computer Science (1 paper)International Journal of Medical Sciences (1 paper)Procedia Computer Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChileSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Luis Rojas
5 papers receiving 16 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 2
- Architecture 1
- Human-Computer Interaction 3
- Information Systems 6
- Software 1
Countries citing papers authored by Luis Rojas
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Rojas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Rojas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Rojas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Rojas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Rojas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Rojas. The network helps show where Luis Rojas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Luis Rojas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Luis Rojas
Luis Rojas is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 16 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Persona Design and Applications (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (2 papers), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper), Design Education and Practice (1 paper) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (2 citations), Architecture (1 citation), Human-Computer Interaction (3 citations), Information Systems (6 citations) and Software (1 citation). Luis Rojas has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniela Quiñones, Rodrigo F. Herrera, Claudio Cubillos, O. Martı́nez, Miguel Ángel Álvarez-Mon, Freddy Paz, Cielo García‐Montero, Miguel Ángel Martínez‐González, Carolina Donat‐Vargas and Miguel Á. Ortega. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Information and Software Technology, PeerJ Computer Science, International Journal of Medical Sciences and Procedia Computer Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.