International Journal of Medical Sciences

67.3k citations
3.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • MicroRNA in disease regulation
    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Hepatology top 5%
    • Hepatitis C virus research

Papers in

    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 159
    • MicroRNA in disease regulation 130
    • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 70

International Journal of Medical Sciences

3.0k papers receiving 61.2k citations

Peers

International Journal of Medical Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Cancer Research 6.1k
  • Hepatology 2.5k
  • Molecular Biology 17.1k
  • Epidemiology 6.7k
  • Oncology 5.1k
Replace Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research with:
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research Brazil
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy United States
Drug Design Development and Therapy China
Journal of International Medical Research China
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis China
Chinese Medical Journal China
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine Japan
Medical Science Monitor China
Annals of Medicine China
Annals of Translational Medicine China
International Journal of Medical Sciences relative to Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research Brazil Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Medical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Medical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences.

About International Journal of Medical Sciences

The 3.4k papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 67.3k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Medical Sciences usually cover Cancer Research (370 papers), Hepatology (120 papers), Oncology (372 papers), Molecular Biology (956 papers) and Epidemiology (397 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (159 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (130 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (122 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (121 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (91 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (82 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (70 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Medical Sciences are Rajamanickam Baskar, R. Yeo, Kuo Ann Lee, Kheng‐Wei Yeoh, Timothy R. Morgan, Salil Patel, Pierre N. Azzam, Toshiyuki Sakaeda, Kaori Kadoyama and Manash K. Paul.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact