Information and Software Technology

3.8k papers and 73.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Information and Software Technology in the last decades have received a total of 73.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Information and Software Technology usually cover Information Systems (2.6k papers), Software (1.4k papers) and Artificial Intelligence (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (1.8k papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1.1k papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (900 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information and Software Technology are Barbara Kitchenham, Tore Dybå, Torgeir Dingsøyr, David Budgen, Kai Petersen, O. Pearl Brereton, J.S. Briggs, Stephen Linkman, LF Marshall and Ludwik Kuźniarz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information and Software Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information and Software Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information and Software Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Information and Software Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information and Software Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information and Software Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information and Software Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025