This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fermentation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fermentation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fermentation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fermentation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fermentation.
About Fermentation
The 3.7k papers published in Fermentation in the last decades have received a total of 42.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Fermentation usually cover Food Science (1.5k papers), Biotechnology (515 papers), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (72 papers), Biochemistry (244 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (550 papers) specifically the topics of Biofuel production and bioconversion (714 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (643 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (586 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (583 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (309 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (294 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (284 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (271 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fermentation are Alice Vilela, Graham G. Stewart, Martin Koller, Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, Nhuan P. Nghiem, Pradeep Kumar, Prakrati Garg, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Saurabh Kulshrestha and Ranjana Sharma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.