This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fermentation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fermentation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fermentation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fermentation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fermentation.
About Fermentation
The 3.9k papers published in Fermentation in the last decades have received a total of 47.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Fermentation usually cover Food Science (1.5k papers), Biotechnology (297 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (357 papers), Building and Construction (322 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (573 papers) specifically the topics of Probiotics and Fermented Foods (744 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (619 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (498 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (357 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (348 papers), Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (320 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (162 papers) and Algal biology and biofuel production (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fermentation are Alice Vilela, Graham G. Stewart, Martin Koller, Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, Nhuan P. Nghiem, Pradeep Kumar, Prakrati Garg, Saurabh Kulshrestha, Ranjana Sharma and Shashi Kant Bhatia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.