Lothar Veits

1.1k citations
28 papers · 409 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Lothar Veits

26 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Lothar Veits
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Gastroenterology 34
  • Oncology 151
  • Transplantation 12
  • Neurology 66
  • Epidemiology 104
Replace M.C. Cox with:
M.C. Cox United States
Anne‐Sophie de Lajarte‐Thirouard France
Yasuo Hosouchi Japan
Akihito Nishio Japan
Fai Chung United States
Monica Onorati Italy
Robert F. Peterson United States
Guenter Kloeppel Germany
Yuki Shinno Japan
Lothar Veits relative to M.C. Cox United States M.C. Cox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M.C. Cox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lothar Veits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lothar Veits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lothar Veits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lothar Veits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lothar Veits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lothar Veits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lothar Veits. The network helps show where Lothar Veits may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lothar Veits, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lothar Veits Line = papers co-authored together Lothar Veits links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201681
2 201147
3 201537
4 201633
5 201127
6 201527
7 201621
8 201320
9 201116
10 201114
11 201413
12 200811
13
EpCAM overexpression is associated with high-grade urothelial carcinoma in the renal pelvis.
200810
14 20129
15 20188
16 20127
17 20215
18 20185
19 20204
20 20233

About Lothar Veits

Lothar Veits is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (5 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (4 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (2 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (34 citations), Oncology (151 citations), Transplantation (12 citations), Neurology (66 citations) and Epidemiology (104 citations). Lothar Veits has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Vieth, William Sterlacci, Alexandar Tzankov, Michael Fiegl, Christina Falkeis, Thomas Kirchner, Helmut Blum, Anja Foerster, Helene Geddert and Andreas Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Digestive Diseases and Sciences, United European Gastroenterology Journal, Endoscopy, American Journal of Clinical Pathology and Diagnostic Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact