M.C. Cox
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
-
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Papers in
- Oncology 16
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 8
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 7
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 3
-
- Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations 7
- Co-authors
- David S. Hong (8 shared papers)Scott Cruickshank (7 shared papers)Anna F. Farago (8 shared papers)Afshin Dowlati (5 shared papers)Marcia S. Brose (4 shared papers)Julia Scarisbrick (2 shared papers)Robert C. Doebele (3 shared papers)Alice T. Shaw (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Oncology (9 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Journal of Thoracic Oncology (3 papers)European Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Annals of Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
M.C. Cox
21 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Dermatology 106
- Oncology 180
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 117
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 177
- Cancer Research 74
Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Cox. The network helps show where M.C. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 114 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 1 |
About M.C. Cox
M.C. Cox is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (8 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (7 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (4 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers) and Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (106 citations), Oncology (180 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (117 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (177 citations) and Cancer Research (74 citations). M.C. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David S. Hong, Scott Cruickshank, Anna F. Farago, Afshin Dowlati, Marcia S. Brose, Julia Scarisbrick, Robert C. Doebele, Alice T. Shaw, Steven G. Smith and Howard A. Burris. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, European Journal of Cancer and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.